RNC vs DNC- Comparing the Speakers of 2012
FixTheNation.com - Your Voice, Your Vote, Your Country
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Posts

Immigration Reform in 2018- What Can, or Should, be Done and How Bold Can, or Will, Washington DC be? It goes WAY beyond DACA or a Wall…
Life after Tax Reform, from Micro, Macro, & Beyond
Millennials - Who are they Really? What say YOU?
Here's a Tip, Congress... CUTSPENDING!
Fixing Education in America


A Better Day in America
America 2.0 - the Upgrade
Contract for America
Debt and Deficit- US
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Reserve
Federal Trade Commission
First 100 Days
Fiscal Cliff
Foreign Policy
Freddie and Fannie
Health Care
International Intervention
New Businesses/Job Creation
Postal Service
Revenue- Job Creation
Sallie Mae- Education in General
Social Security
Spending Cuts
Trade Deals
TRUMP 2016
Trump Book
Why Reform
World Bank/IMF


January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011

powered by


RNC vs DNC- Comparing the Speakers of 2012

So who spoke at the Conventions and what does that say about each party?
THAT was the question I put to myself. Yes, we all heard the prime-time speakers and sound bites, we all heard of the "cool" or embarrassing moments, we all heard the version the media fed us.
But what about a little breakdown of WHO spoke and what that says for each party. I got curious- so here it goes.
The Republicans had 85 speakers in their 3 day event, whereas Democrats had 107 total speakers.
The Republicans had 27% women (probably a mistake for the party defending itself about having a "war" on women) speak vs the Democrats 40% (nice showing for a party concerned about losing the women vote).
The Republicans had over 24% from swing states, whereas the Democrats had under 19%. THIS might have been a critical mistake by the Democrats.
Looking inside the swing state breakdown gives a really interesting peak into the different strategies being applied by both major parties.
The Republicans spread the wealth- Florida 5, Wisconsin 4, Ohio and North Carolina 3, Virginia 2, Nevada/Iowa/Michigan 1, and Colorado was the only swing state to be left out on the speaker platform.
The Democrats took a different path. North Carolina got 10 speakers- yes, 10 speakers from their state. Ohio got 3, Wisconsin and Florida 2, Virginia/Nevada/Colorado got 1- while Iowa/Michigan/New Hampshire were shut out of the platform in 2012.
The contrast comes down to this in my opinion. The Republicans are making a broad appeal to the swing states overall. They value all of them, but are targeting half or more of them. Two of the prime time speakers also came from swing states (Christie and Rubio). The Democrats are more about protecting their core base of non-swing states, but giving some strategic love to NC- a state they probably believe to be in play and worth stealing from the Republicans for the second national election in a row.
My ending comment about the speakers has 2 main points. Whereas both parties have a strong bench of young up-and-comers, what we actually need in this country are doers- not talkers. So THAT is what I would keep in mind come election day- WHO is going to fix this country?
HINT: One party has succeeded at the state level several times over the last few years, whereas the other doesn't have a single success story and a lot of failure...  Can you guess which is which?
See you at the polls Nov 6th!

0 Comments to RNC vs DNC- Comparing the Speakers of 2012:

Comments RSS

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment
Website Builder provided by  Vistaprint